

agency said a backup power supply line should be reestablished and asked that “all military activities that may affect the power supply systems end.” A loss of those cooling systems could lead to a nuclear meltdown. The plant normally relies on outside power to run critical cooling systems for its reactors and spent fuel. In its report, the IAEA noted that on several occasions, the plant lost, fully or in part, its off-site power supply because of military activity in the area. World leaders have called for the demilitarization of the plant, which has been occupied by Russian forces since the early days of the war but is being run by Ukrainian engineers. It wasn’t immediately clear what caused the blast. The explosion left the city of 53,000 cut off from its power and water supplies. The Ukrainian mayor of Enerhodar, Dmytro Orlov, reported a powerful blast in the city around midday. Russian-installed officials accused Ukrainian forces of shelling Enerhodar, the city where the plant is situated, while the Ukrainians said Kremlin forces attacked the city of Nikopol, across the Dnieper River from the power station. Shelling continued around Europe’s largest nuclear plant on Tuesday, a day after it was again knocked off Ukraine’s electrical grid and put in the precarious position of relying on its own power to run its safety systems. Security Council later Tuesday on his findings.

IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi, who led the inspection visit, was due to brief the U.N. “This requires agreement by all relevant parties to the establishment of a nuclear safety and security protection zone” around the plant, it said. In a report following a visit by an inspection team last week, the International Atomic Energy Agency said “shelling on site and in its vicinity should be stopped immediately to avoid any further damages to the plant and associated facilities, for the safety of the operating staff and to maintain the physical integrity to support safe and secure operation.”
